Discussion:
Presidential election
Tom Sathre
2004-11-08 00:54:54 UTC
Permalink
laz,

Responding to this note of yours is across supper time for me. I read your
note before supper and am writing you after supper. I used to have one
response but now have another. OWR, then, is like so many other words that
are supported by Scripture but not used, per se, in Scripture: "rapture"
and "Trinity" are other examples of words like OWR in this respect.

Tom.

Tom Sathre
Address: ***@acm.org
(303)973-8035 (H)
(303)677-0735 (W)
[Original Message]
Date: 11/1/2004 9:50:53 PM
Subject: Re: { Questioners } Presidential election
As far as I can tell the phrase itself comes from man and mans
understanding/interpretation of eschatology.
laz
laz,
So where did the phrase "one world religion" come from?
Tom.
Tom Sathre
(303)973-8035 (H)
(303)677-0735 (W)
[Original Message]
Date: 10/25/2004 1:44:27 PM
Subject: Re: { Questioners } Presidential election
There is no phrase OWR in scripture. And I admit my opinion in
this may
be slanted some from past church teachings.
Yet the scripture does seem to point to this happening with the
false
prophet and the apostasy.
laz
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 15:57:46 -0600 "Tom Sathre"
laz,
This is Tom Sathre.
So, where did the phrase OWR come from? Chapter and verse,
please -
or the
phases' secular origin if it's not Biblical.
Tom.
Tom Sathre
(303)973-8035 (H)
(303)677-0735 (W)
[Original Message]
Date: 10/19/2004 1:31:17 PM
Subject: Re: { Questioners } Presidential election
I use OWR and ONW in the same context, one backs the other and
this comes
from the 'picture' put forth in scripture concerning the last
days.
Religion and economics will play a major part in the rising up
of
these
2.
BTW- this is not 'modern prophecy' excepting in regards to we
are
living
in so called modern times. These prophecies are thousands of
years
old.
shalom
laz
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 10:09:46 -0600 "Tom Sathre"
laz,
I'm using 'perjoration' in its ordinary sense. A rough
equivalent is
"put
down" or 'name calling'.
... and I certainly do know what "one world religion" means.
I
was
asking
where that phrase comes from. There are several references
in
Revelation to
"whole world" and its grammatical cousins, which might mean
the
same
as
"OWR". Also, "OWR" is fairly commonly used by people with
interest
in
modern prophecy. But, you, please, tell me where you got the
term.
I
suspect that the phrase "OWR" is used rather loosely,
perhaps as
an
"empty
put down".
Tom.
Tom Sathre
(303)973-8035 (H)
(303)677-0735 (W)
[Original Message]
Date: 10/12/2004 6:20:43 PM
Subject: Re: { Questioners } Presidential election
1st, what does 'perjoration' mean?
Later day prophesies point to a time where a humanist
religion
and
secular government will join hands as one serving the
other.
religion
serving government, in which the government will be in
the
hands
of one
man, Anti-Messiah...or really a better term to use would
be
'one
whom
claims to be Messiah, but is not.
We see this happening in this day, and for quite a number
of
years
now it
has been growing. As different denominations and such come
together
compromising the faith in the name of love of grace and
mercy
and
forming
one new religion. One of Hindu's, Buddhists, Baptist,
Methodists,
Achiest, Agnostics, Satanists, etc....... All one in the
name
of
peace,
love, and other things falsely. Counterfeit. Liars.
Pretenders.
Enemies
of the true faith. Denying the power of the spirit and the
truth's
of
YHWH and His Salvation/Y'Shua.
These will eventually worship the Beast and the Pretender.
Taking
on the
number, whatever that looks like or comes to be in the
natural
and
spiritual.
Those who are of the real, the chosen of YHWH, the set
apart
assemblies,
the true Israel, will be persecuted by the counterfeit.
They
will
refuse
to worship the Beast and most likely be labeled
troublemakers
and
blasphemers by the counterfeit. And the counterfeit will
believe
she is
doing 'god' a favor.
The real will trust YHWH, and live from the Bread of Life
and
be a
very
real thorn in the side of the counterfeit by her
uncompromising
light of
truth and trust in Him.
The counterfeit will hate the real, as she does now.
Because
she
cannot
bear the truth or the revealing light of the truth.
I am curious? You are the very 1st person I have spoken
this
to
who does
not know what I am talking about? Even among
non-believers.
shalom
laz
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 18:42:53 -0600 "Tom Sathre"
Laz,
This is Tom Sathre.
What is the origin and meaning of "one world religion"?
I'm
concerned that
it is too often used as general perjoration, not very
specific
at
all.
Tom.
Tom Sathre
(303)973-8035 (H)
(303)677-4697 (W)
[Original Message]
Date: 10/3/2004 6:19:38 PM
Subject: Re: { Questioners } Presidential election
On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 17:00:31 -0500 "Jonathan E.
Brickman"
Even in this I have a sense of foreboding and
trembling.
Because
the
Spirit will direct according to the will of the
Father
and
just
HOW the
shaking will advance. On the one hand we have one
candidate
who
would
turn over the sovereignty of the nation to an
Global
Counsel
so to
speak.
On the other hand we have another who is against
doing
this at
all.
I would like to suggest that both candidates are
eager
to
turn
over
sovereignty of the U.S.A. I would like to suggest
that
the
difference is the challenger would do it openly,
whereas
the
incumbent is doing it covertly and lying about it to
those
who
would
rather not see it happen.
Well, I know the consperatists claim these things. I
learned
long
ago
that the consperacy theories missed some very
important
truth's.
They
have been around since before the time thay were
capable
of
forming the
links sais of them to perform global power. It has
only
been
the
last
several years that this has been posible at all.
So I havve learned to take all theories with a grain
of
salt
and
smile..... For the truth of the matter is MUCH more
sinister
and
terrifying. The real consperacy is in the heavenlies.
It
only
works
out
in the natural as well at it is able to pursuade man
to
follow.
The catch and enemy of the power in the heavenlies in
this
is
Y'shua and
His redemptive work. So ANY who will choose to believe
in
Him
and
follow
Him will be saved and freed from the deception of this
heavenly
power.
Either way, it has already been prophesied what will
come
to
be.
To try
and get beyond this or surpass this is to 'kick
against
the
pricks'. Not
to say we have no battle of our own in Him, but that
the
prophesies will
come to pass no matter what.
There WILL be one world government and one world
religion.
The
test and
trial is who will be given over to it vs. who will
stand,
in
faith,
against it.
To turn our sovereignty over would mean eventual
an
Islamic
overflow in
all the nation I believe, as well as bring us in
alignment
with
the One
World (eventual) government (and religion). In
turn
which
will
eventually
turn its back on Israel completely, which history
shows is
the
first step
before persecution comes to the rest of the House
of
Israel
(which
includes the church).
I would like to suggest that the Islamic overflow
will
occur, or
will be prevented by God, no matter which candidate
wins.
True. Only HOW this comes about is what I am
addressing.
I believe we all have been seeing this shaking for
a
number of
years.
Many of us have called it this or that, but we
have
all
felt
something.
The problem is just as this election, some say the
Lord
says
this,
others
that. THIS should shake us NOW.
Indeed. But the Lord says that nothing should shake
us
at
all,
save
Himself. Do you remember?
Do you remember He said, 'Yet once again, I will shake
ALL
THINGS,
in the
heavenlies and in the earth'? This IS part of that
shaking.
What
did you
think it would look like in the beginning?
I know this is long, For that I apologize. But I
cannot
possible
even
write all I have been seeing and perhaps am not
to.
But
to
not
speak
would be a sin I believe.
Not to speak about what? About the fact that the
Body
of
Christ
should be worrying about cares of this world? I
suggest
that
according to the Lord, the Body of Christ should not
be
worrying
about cares of this world.
Did I say a thing about worry? Do you really think I
am
speaking
about
the cares of this world? Or is it that maybe in truth
the
cares of
this
world have need of being 'shaken' from us perhaps?
What do
you
think?
We as His people HAVE TO come into the oneness
Y'shua
spoke
of,
prayed to
be, and said would be. I know this oneness doesn't
mean we
are
not
individuals within the oneness, but that we
discern in
the
spirit
truly
according to His will. Step in step, hand in hand
as
one,
in
the
natural
as well as the spirit. Uncompromising in the
faith,
faces
set
like
flint
towards the goal, and this for and to His glory,
His
namesake
alone.
I suggest that this oneness you speak of will only
occur
at
the
last
day, when the Lord separates the wheat from the
chaff.
I suggest you deny the power of the Spirit and do not
understand
what the
seperating will look like. Read John 17 again. Y'shua
was
not
speaking of
future, unatainable things as much as here and now
things.
Something much of the first century body have which we
have
lost.
--
Jonathan E. Brickman
shalom
laz
Yahoo! Groups Links
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
--------------------~-->
$9.95 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/J8kdrA/y20IAA/yQLSAA/feholB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Yahoo! Groups Links
Yahoo! Groups Links
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
--------------------~-->
$9.95 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/J8kdrA/y20IAA/yQLSAA/feholB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Yahoo! Groups Links
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
--------------------~-->
Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/feholB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Yahoo! Groups Links
Yahoo! Groups Links
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
$9.95 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/J8kdrA/y20IAA/yQLSAA/feholB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
m***@juno.com
2004-11-09 21:18:09 UTC
Permalink
I would have to say yes, as for as my understanding goes. But I am also
much more inclined to follow this line of reasoning considering the OWR,
than the rapture theory which scripture teaches in opposition to. Trinity
is another matter, the problem being humans trying to explain the
unexplainable. In the process they divide Elohim into three seperate
'person'. When Elohim is not a person at all, but Elohim. He is not a man
that He should be in the limitations which His creation/man has.

Hope you enjoyed your supper...<s>... I fxed and ate some righteous
homecooked turnip greens and turnips myself!

shalom
laz
Post by Tom Sathre
laz,
Responding to this note of yours is across supper time for me. I
read your
note before supper and am writing you after supper. I used to have
one
response but now have another. OWR, then, is like so many other
words that
"rapture"
and "Trinity" are other examples of words like OWR in this respect.
Tom.
Tom Sathre
(303)973-8035 (H)
(303)677-0735 (W)
[Original Message]
Date: 11/1/2004 9:50:53 PM
Subject: Re: { Questioners } Presidential election
As far as I can tell the phrase itself comes from man and mans
understanding/interpretation of eschatology.
laz
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 08:13:45 -0700 "Tom Sathre"
laz,
So where did the phrase "one world religion" come from?
Tom.
Tom Sathre
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
$9.95 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/J8kdrA/y20IAA/yQLSAA/feholB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Loading...